Managing Interface Blasting Without Halting Production
Planning the Impossible? Managing Interface Blasting Without Halting Production One of the toughest challenges we face as mine planners is this: šŗ Stripping waste in the upper cutback š» Mining ore in the lower cutback š£ And now ā you need to schedule a blast on the interface between them. From a planning and scheduling standpoint, itās a delicate balance. You're walking a tightrope between production continuity, safety, and slope integrity. This is what I think; Hereās the approach thatās worked consistently in the field: ā Advance stripping with a setback (trims) ā adjust your crest limits to maintain a safe distance from the lower cutback edge. ā Schedule buffer time to build temporary catch berms or bunds above the drop zone ā these small features prevent big problems. ā Stagger the blast sequence ā break the blast into smaller pads and schedule each with clearance time for inspection. ā Coordinate blast windows with operations ā pause lower cutback activity, and build this downtime into your schedule early. ā Reduce charge energy at the interface, and consult D&B for delay timing aligned with void proximity. ā After the blast, schedule immediate cleanup and berm repair to clear any fines or blockages before recommencing traffic. ā Most importantly, work hand-in-hand with geotech and operations ā good schedules only work with good collaboration. This isnāt just another blast ā itās a high-risk interface event that can impact haulage, ore supply, and safety. It demands proactive planning, flexibility in scheduling, and a sharp eye for interdependencies. š As planners, we donāt just make the maps ā we protect the people and the plan. Have you had to schedule interface blasting before? What worked for you ā and what would you do differently? š Iād love to hear how others have navigated this planning puzzle.