๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐“๐„๐Œ๐๐“๐€๐“๐ˆ๐Ž๐ Big muckpile. Big pride. Itโ€™s the dopamine hit of blast day. But hereโ€™s the uncomfortable truth:๐Ÿ” ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฒ, ๐˜„๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฒ. ๐Ÿง  ๐–๐‡๐˜ ๐ƒ๐Ž ๐’๐Ž๐Œ๐„ ๐’๐ˆ๐“๐„๐’ ๐Š๐„๐„๐ ๐†๐Ž๐ˆ๐๐† ๐๐ˆ๐†? Letโ€™s be honest . itโ€™s not always about the geology or production goals. โ€ข ๐—˜๐—ด๐—ผ : Loud blasts look like performance. โ€ข ๐—›๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ถ๐˜ : โ€œWeโ€™ve always done it this way.โ€ โ€ข ๐—ฆ๐—ต๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜-๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—บ : KPIs get ticked. Targets met. Meanwhile, operations quietly bleed. Blasting is also psychology . Not just art. Not just science. And sometimes, itโ€™s emotionally driven. ๐Ÿ’ฃ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐Œ๐ˆ๐’๐…๐ˆ๐‘๐„ ๐Œ๐”๐‹๐“๐ˆ๐๐‹๐ˆ๐„๐‘ Big blasts donโ€™t just concentrate energy. They concentrate ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ธ. One misfire in a small blast? โžก๏ธ Annoying. One misfire in a large blast? โžก๏ธ Dangerous. Disruptive ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ Expensive. Letโ€™s break it down: โ€ข ๐Ÿ‘ท ๐—ฆ๐—ฎ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜๐˜† ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜: Unexploded charges = silent killers during mucking or secondary operations. โ€ข ๐Ÿšง ๐—ข๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐——๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€: Canโ€™t dig. Canโ€™t load. Canโ€™t crush. Everything stops. โ€ข ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐—–๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ: Re-drilling, re-priming, idle machines โ€” your โ€œcost-savingโ€ blast just blew its own budget. And ironically? Big blasts often skip quality checks in the name of ๐™š๐’‡๐™›๐’Š๐™˜๐’Š๐™š๐’๐™˜๐’š. But when you scale up, your margin for error shrinks. In a small blast, you canโ€™t afford a misfire. In a big one? You canโ€™t afford ๐’‚๐™ฃ๐’š๐™ฉ๐’‰๐™ž๐’๐™œ ๐™ก๐’†๐™จ๐’” ๐’•๐™๐’‚๐™ฃ ๐™ฅ๐’†๐™ง๐’‡๐™š๐’„๐™ฉ๐’Š๐™ค๐’. And thatโ€™s a dangerous bet. ๐“๐‡๐„ "๐„๐…๐…๐ˆ๐‚๐ˆ๐„๐๐‚๐˜" ๐Ž๐… ๐๐ˆ๐†๐†๐„๐‘ ๐‡๐Ž๐‹๐„๐’ ๐ˆ๐’ ๐€ ๐Œ๐ˆ๐‘๐€๐†๐„ Yes, larger diameter holes = fewer drill meters. Fewer holes sound like savings. But hereโ€™s what doesnโ€™t make it into the dashboard: โ€ข ๐Ÿ’ฅ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ป ๐—˜๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐˜† ๐——๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป: Large holes donโ€™t spread energy evenly. Fragmentation suffer โ€ข ๐Ÿชจ ๐Œ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐Ž๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐ข๐ณ๐ž: You trade finer fragmentation for unpredictable boulders โ€ข ๐Ÿ“ ๐‘๐ž๐๐ฎ๐œ๐ž๐ ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ: Wider burdens and spacings = precision out the window. โ€ข ๐ŸŽฏ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ซ ๐“๐ข๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐…๐ฅ๐ž๐ฑ๐ข๐›๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ: Fewer holes = less control over initiation sequencing Itโ€™s not efficiency. Itโ€™s erosion of control, consistency, and downstream productivity. ๐Ÿงฑ ๐๐ˆ๐† ๐๐‹๐€๐’๐“๐’ ๐๐”๐ˆ๐‹๐ƒ ๐๐€๐ƒ ๐‡๐€๐๐ˆ๐“๐’ When teams get used to chasing tonnage through size alone, something more dangerous happens: ๐™๐™๐™š๐™ฎ ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ฅ ๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ฉ๐™ž๐™ข๐™ž๐™ฏ๐™ž๐™ฃ๐™œ. - Precision gets replaced by routine. - Initiation timing? โ€œGood enough.โ€ - Burden checks? โ€œNext time.โ€ - Post-blast reviews? โ€œNo time, weโ€™re busy moving muck.โ€ ๐Ÿง  What starts as a tactical decision becomes a cultural drift. And suddenly, a site that once engineered every hole is now managing by momentum Let's stop chasing size and start chasing strategy because โ€œ๐˜ฝ๐™ž๐™œโ€ ๐™ค๐™›๐™ฉ๐™š๐™ฃ ๐™ข๐™š๐™–๐™ฃ๐™จ ๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™˜๐™š๐™ง๐™ฉ๐™–๐™ž๐™ฃ.